SoHo News Update – Solstice Edition

– Sullivan-Thompson Historic District Designated!
– Pier 40 / St. John’s Agreement Approved – Community Comes Out Ahead
– NYU’s Behemoth Revealed = Ugh!

First, we wish you and yours all the best for the holidays and the new year ahead.

At this time, we also ask you to help us in our efforts to maintain our neighborhood’s integrity and sustainability in 2017.

Please make a contribution to the SoHo Alliance at or mail your check to us at PO Box 429, New York, NY 10012.  
We only ask once a year, so please be generous.
This is a gift that will benefit you for years to come.

– Sullivan-Thompson Historic District Designated
On Tuesday, the Landmarks Preservation Commission unanimously voted to designate a new historic district on SoHo’s western side, the South Village’s Sullivan-Thompson Historic District. Click here for a map and images of the new historic district.

The City had long refused to consider landmark protections for the area, until the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation mobilized the local community to oppose a proposed rezoning of the nearby three-block-long St. John’s Building site in West SoHo (Houston Street between Washington and West Streets), as well as to demand landmark protections for the South Village.

GVSHP, SoHo Alliance, Community Board 2  and community leaders argued that the proposed rezoning, supported by the City, would increase development pressure on the nearby historic and endangered South Village.  City Councilmember Corey Johnson championed this cause, securing a commitment from the Landmarks Preservation Commission to consider designation.

Historic designation protects 160 buildings from demolition and possible replacement with high-rise towers not unlike Trump SoHo, which the SoHo Alliance fought hard against.  Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, owns one such property, the large empty lot and adjacent tenement building on the southwest corner of Houston and Sullivan Street.  Local residents have repeatedly contacted the SoHo Alliance, expressing their fears that Kushner would want to build a tower there to rival his father-in-law’s.  This landmarking designation greatly relieves those and other concerns.

– Pier 40 / St. John’s Agreement Approved
In another extraordinary victory for our community this past week, the City Council approved the Pier 40/St. John’s rezoning plan, negotiated by our Councilmember Corey Johnson.  (Johnson’s district starts on the west side of Thompson Street and extends to the Hudson River; Margaret Chin’s district starts on the east side of Thompson and extends to the East River)

Bouyed by a widespread community effort again spearheaded by GVSHP and the community board, Johnson was able to secure many protections and benefits that the Greenwich Village and SoHo communities have been fighting for years to attain.

Because this struggle extends almost half a century, having its genesis in the failed Westway controversy of the 70s and 80s, we won’t fill you in all details here, but refer you to this comprehensive article in The Villager.

Basically, the deal consists of rezoning the St. John’s site from manufacturing to residential use, while transferring 200,000 square feet of Pier 40 air rights into the new project.   In turn, Pier 40 will get an infusion of $100 million in exchange for the air rights, with the money being used to shore up the 15-acre pier’s badly corroded pilings.  Johnson also secured $14 million in City funding to ensure the pier’s sustainability.

The existing three-block-long St. John’s building will be demolished and replaced with a 43-story building.  Yes, this is a very tall building on our low-rise waterfront.  However, what could have been built there without this deal would have been much worse, e.g., a hotel, a big box store, offices, or event spaces that would have drawn loads of people through our neighborhood, but add not one resident or a single unit of affordable housing, or any community amenity.

There will be 1,586 residential units, 476 of them permanently affordable.  Of these, 175 units will be for low-income seniors; the rest for low- and moderate-income families.  After this one-time air-rights transfer, the deal prohibits any future transfers, ensuring that no more high rises will be constructed along our community’s waterfront.

Seven street-level retail stores and a 10,000 square-foot gym to be shared with the building residents and the public are part of the settlement.  A much-needed supermarket will be also included.  Big box stores over 10,000 square-feet will not be permitted.

– NYU’s Behemoth Revealed = Ugh!
Not everything went so well for us this week.  NYU finally revealed the drawings for its so-called Zipper Building that the SoHo Alliance and other community groups fought so hard for years to prevent.  Comprised mostly of student dorms and containing 735,000 square feet of floor area, about one-third the bulk of the Empire State Building, the 300-foot structure is worse than anyone could imagine.  See below for yourself.

During the Bloomberg administration, NYU had the area rezoned to midtown standards —  but this awkward building would be an atrocity even in midtown.  Considering that the SoHo, NoHo, Greenwich Village and South Village Historic Districts – as well as several Individual Landmarks – encircle this all-glass modernist structure, NYU’s building is a further affront to our community.

Interestingly, notice how much of the bulk of the building is located on SoHo’s doorstep, on Houston Street at Mercer.  And see how the NYU drawings do not actually show the entire height of this monstrous tower.  We can thank Councilmember Margaret Chin for that abomination, when she inexplicably asked NYU to shift much of the original bulk of the building from Bleecker Street to Houston Street.

For a more detailed description, we refer you to the story in this week Villager.

Again asking you to be generous and contribute to our annual fund drive at or PO Box 429, NY, NY 10012,


Sean Sweeney, Director
SoHo Alliance
PO Box 429
NY, NY 10012

You’re fired! Stars shun Trump Soho Hotel

You’re fired! Stars shun Trump Soho Hotel

BY DENNIS LYNCH | The Trump Soho Hotel is not the place to be anymore, at least for members of the New York paparazzi. Sightings — of both the “shooters” and their celebrity prey — have sharply decreased since Donald Trump rose to the top of the Republican Party and won this year’s presidential election, according to pavement-pounding pap.

“Almost nobody has stayed there for the last six months at least,” said the photographer, who hasn’t snapped pictures of any celebs there since around April. “Most A-listers now stay at the Greenwich Hotel owned by [Robert] De Niro, or the Bowery Hotel or the Mercer Hotel, some Uptown at the Ritz [Carlton] or London [NYC]. It’s possible some celebs are staying [at the Trump Soho], but not the usual numbers who were before.”

Paparazzi have not been seen hanging around the front of the Trump Soho Hotel for the past six months — because their favorite subject, celebrities, are reportedly no longer staying there. In the past, paparazzi could frequently be seen standing to either side of the front door waiting for stars — like singers Rihanna or Chris Brown or TV actors — to enter and exit. Photos by Jonathan Alpeyrie

Paparazzi have not been seen hanging around the front of the Trump Soho Hotel for the past six months — because their favorite subject, celebrities, are reportedly no longer staying there. In the past, paparazzi could frequently be seen standing to either side of the front door waiting for stars — like singers Rihanna or Chris Brown or TV actors — to enter and exit. Photos by Jonathan Alpeyrie

The photographer speculated that many entertainment stars are avoiding the Trump Soho because of its connection to the president-elect, or that a booker with connections to the many network TV morning shows and studios Uptown possibly left the organization at some point for unknown reasons, as well.

The decrease in sightings confirms the findings from some data scientists who track the hotel bookings of famous and common folk alike. Hipmunk, a San Francisco-based travel company, found that the share of Trump-branded bookings on its site fell around 58 percent in the first half of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015.

The data scientists over at the discovery-focused mobile app Foursquare also noted that foot traffic to Trump’s U.S. hotels, casinos and golf courses was down every month of 2016 compared to those same months in 2015, except in January and February, when they increased by 4 and 5 percent, respectively. Between March and July of this year, traffic was down between 14 and 17 percent compared to those same months in 2015.

Doormen at the Trump Soho Hotel, at Varick and Spring Sts., don’t have to keep paparazzi at bay much lately, since the stars aren’t staying there anymore.

Doormen at the Trump Soho Hotel, at Varick and Spring Sts., don’t have to keep paparazzi at bay much lately, since the stars aren’t staying there anymore.

Cleveland Cavaliers hoops superstar LeBron James and “several” of his teammates made headlines earlier this month when they decided to lay their heads elsewhere during a trip to the Big Apple for a game against the hometown Knicks. James was diplomatic about the choice, telling reporters during a shootaround at Madison Square Garden that it was just his “personal preference.”

“At the end of the day, I hope he’s one of the best presidents ever for all of our sake, my family, for all of us,” the three-time NBA champ said, according to CNN. “But [it’s] just not my personal preference. It would be the same if I went to a restaurant and decided to eat chicken and not steak.”

The Los Angeles Lakers organization also chose to stay elsewhere during a trip to face the Brooklyn Nets following the election. A source told the Los Angeles Times that the basketball team’s decision was motivated by security concerns surrounding the protests that cropped up at President-elect Trump’s many properties since his November victory, not politics.

The Trump Soho Hotel did not return requests for comment.

Landmarks Preservation Commission to Vote Tuesday on Designating Thompson-Sullivan Historic District

Please Attend LPC Hearing or Email the Commissioners to Vote “Yes”
After a ten-year struggle, the Landmarks Preservation Commission has listened to the pleas of our community and will hold a public hearing this Tuesday to decide whether to landmark the proposed Sullivan-Thompson Historic District, also known as the South Village, on SoHo’s western flank.
The district extends roughly from Houston Street to Watts Street and from Sixth Avenue to the east side of Thompson Street.  It will be the third and final stage of the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation’s remarkable effort to landmark the entire South Village.
Besides fine architectural examples of both Italianate-style tenements and Federal-style homes and townhouses, the area has a rich cultural heritage, being the center of a large Italian-American immigrant community for over a century, as well as a world-renowned incubator for countless musicians, artists, poets and bohemians who have made a lasting impact on both American and world culture.
However, current zoning allows historic buildings to be demolished and replaced by 300-feet towers.  Developers such as Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner have recently bought properties in the proposed historic district, such as 156 Sullivan Street and the adjacent private parking lot on Houston Street.
  • Attend the Landmarks Preservation Commission hearing on Tuesday, November 29 starting at 9 am at the LPC Hearing Room in the Municipal Building, One Centre Street (at Chambers Street), 9th floor.  Bring photo ID.  Sign up to testify when you arrive.  Written testimony is limited to three minutes, but written testimony of any length can be submitted.  Use letter here as sample testimony. Or just come to show support.
  • If you cannot attend, please write the Landmarks Preservation Commission urging them to vote ‘Yes’ on the third phase of GVSHP’s proposed South Village Historic District as soon as possible.  Click here for a link and a Sample Letter, or simply write to
    Sean Sweeney, Director
    SoHo Alliance

Trump Admits SoHo Alliance Caused Him “Unnecessary Anxiety”

-Trump Admits SoHo Alliance Caused Him “Unnecessary Anxiety

-Poll Site Locator

-ACE Leaves SoHo
Trump Admits SoHo Alliance Caused Him “Unnecessary Anxiety
Love him or hate him, you must admit Donald Trump is not shy to admit that he loves a good fight and never gives up.
In his book, Never Give Upthe presidential candidate discusses his “Biggest Challenges”, devoting an entire chapter, I Love A Good Fight, to his battle with the SoHo Alliance when he attempted to build a new residential building here, the Trump SoHo.  
He explains how “zoning laws and local residents, together, created formidable obstacles”.   New residential buildings in SoHo require a zoning variance or special permit but hotels do not.  So Trump instead labeled his building a “condo hotel” in order to avoid this inconvenience.  Additionally, had he gone through the proper route, the building would not have been able to be built so tall.
Trump concedes, “Alliances made it clear that I would not be receiving a warm welcome.”  To say the least. 
He goes on, “The hits kept coming, and it felt like being in the eye of the hurricane…Every adversity served as fuel in what had become a fight of city-sized proportions.”   In his characteristic sanguinity, he declares, “I can guarantee you that my SoHo neighbors are going to love it – eventually.”
The concluding paragraph sums it up well, “SoHo caused perhaps a few more problems than expected…and we are big enough to handle it.  Be sure you have the same attitude – it will save you a lot of unnecessary anxiety.”
Due to several lawsuits and other legal roadblocks from the SoHo Alliance, Trump never got to operate his building as a residential condo.  In fact, it went into foreclosure when Trump failed to sell a single residential unit.  Who wants to buy into a lawsuit? 
It is now operating as a hotel, which is what the zoning laws permit and which is what we wanted him to do all along.  Too bad he didn’t listen to us.
Poll Site Locator
Despite our differences with Donald on zoning issues, the SoHo Alliance is non-partisan.  Whoever is your choice for president, be sure to vote on Tuesday.  Polls open 6am to 9pm.  If you are unsure of your voting site, you can find it here:
ACE Leaving SoHo
ACE, formerly known as the SoHo Partnership, has informed us that it is moving its operations out of SoHo.  
The organization started here in 1992 and helps to rehabilitate recovering homeless while sweeping our streets.  Unfortunately. it can no longer cut it financially here.  The new multinational businesses are reluctant to contribute to this charity and rising wages added to its burden.
As a result, last week ACE’s workers ceased cleaning our sidewalks.  Worse, the Sanitation Department is refusing to empty the special trash bins that ACE used, claiming it slowed their crews down.  So those bins have been removed and you may notice the remaining city trash bins overflow at times.
Another sad development is that ACE can no longer afford the rising commercial rents in SoHo and is locating its offices from Broadway to Long Island City.  The charity has been receiving city funding from the Transportation  Department to maintain several public plazas throughout the city, so at least its worthwhile mission will continue.
ACE served SoHo for a quarter of a century and it will be sorely missed.
Sean Sweeney, Director
SoHo Alliance

August News Update: Street Closing & Mega-Development on the West Side

1) Regarding the proposed Fashion Week event seeking to close Greene Street to traffic, in order to allow a retailer to conduct an amplified, outdoor ‘fashion show’ for 750 people on our sidewalk:

The Community Board recommended denial of the permits that the applicant requested.  It now goes to the Mayor’s Streets Activities Permit Office for review.  We are unsure how the agency will respond; but at the hearing last week, the applicants stated they are paying the city $25,000 to get the permit.

The way things have been going at City Hall recently, we are not sure whether the community board’s advice will be heeded.  Stay tuned.

2) We are joining with our friends at the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation to demand protection from a huge development project planned for the three-block long St. John’s Terminal Building site at Houston and West Streets.

There will be a public hearing on the proposal at City Planning Commission this Tuesday, August 24.

Some 200,000-300,000 square feet of ‘Big Box’ stores and ‘destination retail’ are proposed, which will draw enormous amounts of traffic from all over the metropolitan area.  View the renderings here.

The plan will also open the door to vastly increased development up and down the West SoHo and Greenwich Village waterfront using ‘air rights’ from the nearby Hudson River Park, and leave our nearby South Village community vulnerable to intensified development pressure with no protections for its historic, low-rise residential buildings.


Join us in calling for

  • A ban on any future air rights transfers from the Hudson River Park within Community Board #2
  • An elimination of any ‘Big Box’ stores or ‘destination retail’ from the plan, with only moderately sized, locally oriented stores and a supermarket allowed


  • Come to the City Planning Commission public hearing on Wednesday, August 24 at 22 Reade Street (Broadway/Lafayette) starting at 10 a.m. (It should last for hours, so you can still come late and testify).

Testify or just show support.  Use letter here for sample testimony; click here for more details.

You can check the GVSHP twitter feed at starting at 10 am on the 24th for status updates about the hearing, when public testimony will begin and end, etc.

For more information, click here.


Sean Sweeney, Director

SoHo Alliance

IMPORTANT MEETING: Elizabeth St Garden Update

Wednesday, January 20, 6:30 pm at Scholastic Auditorium, 557 Broadway between Prince & Spring WEAR GREEN
We face a real danger that our beautiful Elizabeth Street Garden could be razed for development – but we can stop it with your help!
The NYC Department of Housing Preservation & Development on Wednesday will present its plans for housing on the garden site, an invitation to developers to destroy our urban oasis.
If you support our efforts for a community garden in our park-starved neighborhood, please attend this meeting to let the HPD and the deBlasio Administration know we need less development and more green space in lower Manhattan
For more information on the garden, please click:
Sean Sweeney
Executive Director

NY Times Reports on SoHo BID Controversy


Critics of SoHo Proposal Ask, You Call This Improvement?

Pedestrian traffic is part of the fight over a plan for a business improvement district along Broadway in SoHo. By


Sean Sweeney, who leads a neighborhood group and worries about the crowds in SoHo, said, “We’re packed.”

Living in SoHo for decades has taught Sean Sweeney how to urge people to hurry up in several languages, though not without his blood pressure shooting up.“Rápido! Vite! Mach schnell!” he hisses as visiting crowds of shoppers shuffle along at a crawl. On weekends he sometimes barrels through packs of dawdlers like a bowling ball through pins. Once, when a group of people, coffees in hand, refused to move off his building’s stoop, the ensuing standoff nearly escalated into a fistfight.

Now there are plans to bring in a business improvement district — a public-private partnership that collects assessments to pay for local improvements like better sanitation, marketing and beautification — and Mr. Sweeney and many of his neighbors are not pleased.

“We don’t need a business improvement district; we need a resident improvement district,” said Mr. Sweeney, who moved into a loft on Greene Street in the early 1980s, during the hard-to-imagine days when SoHo’s soaring factory spaces were vacant and its streets desolate. “We’re packed.”

SoHo, the Lower Manhattan neighborhood so named because it is south of Houston Street, has in the past four decades been transformed from a hard-bitten haven for artists into a magnet for such luxury retailers as Prada and Chanel. Partly as a result, the neighborhood’s residents are in the unusual position of fighting a plan designed to improve conditions in their area, even though the method has been widely embraced throughout the city and is overwhelmingly viewed as helpful, and benign.

The controversy is in its second year and nearing a likely climax this March with a public hearing before the City Council. Not only has it tapped a primal fear among some in SoHo, it has also laid bare a neighborhood schism.

The artists who colonized the neighborhood decades ago may have secured castles in the sky, but they also find themselves surrounded by streets that are clogged by tourists and lined with giant retailers and luxury stores. For them, having a business improvement district formed with the help of real estate giants means ceding more ground to invaders who, they believe, want to increase pedestrian flow to be able to charge more for retail space.

“In SoHo, there’s always a concern that this neighborhood built by pioneers will be further eroded,” said State Senator Daniel L. Squadron, a Democrat who represents the area and opposes the plan.

Brad Hoylman, the chairman of the local community board, which rejected the plan because of a lack of community support, was struck by the outcry.

“I can recall few issues where there has been as much vociferous opposition as the SoHo BID,” he said, referring to the district by its acronym.

But those who support the district say Mr. Sweeney, who himself leads a neighborhood activist group called the SoHo Alliance, and other opponents are fear-mongering and have got it all wrong.

The district, they say, would be formed largely to deal with the effects of the masses that fuel SoHo’s runaway retail success.

Every weekend, the garbage cans on Broadway overflow to the point where people resort to laying trash around them in rings, in what one local politician calls “a sort of tribute to the garbage pail.”

The Sanitation Department cannot keep up. Retailers have repeatedly been fined for messy sidewalks out front. Meanwhile, street vendors gobble up precious sidewalk space, choking pedestrian traffic. Supporters of the district say a full-time staff member could urge illegal vendors and food trucks to leave or could alert the police. Besides, proponents note, the proposed district itself would be only along Broadway between Houston and Canal Streets — and many dissenters live outside that zone.

“There’s no big, bad boogeyman; I don’t want more tourists on Broadway,” said Katy Rice, who supports the new district and who has lived on Broadway for nine years. “As a resident, I don’t want to step on trash, and I don’t want vendors selling hash pipes outside my door.”

The first stirrings of a proposal for the district came three or four years ago.

For nearly two decades, the nonprofit group ACE had supplied the area with street cleaners through a vocational program that provides transitional work experience for formerly homeless men and women.

But in the past five years, the group, which was founded by the philanthropist Henry Buhl, received fewer and fewer donations from residents and retailers along Broadway between Houston and Canal. Sometimes the budget shortfalls exceeded $100,000, and the group found itself diverting money from other programs.

“We were doing this for multinational corporations making billions, and this tiny nonprofit is shouldering this load for nothing,” said Jim Martin, ACE’s executive director.

So last summer, ACE stopped cleaning the Broadway stretch, and the garbage began piling up.

Mr. Buhl and some property owners had been floating the idea of creating the business improvement district by collecting regular assessments from property owners along Broadway to finance an agency that would have an executive director, organize regular street cleanings and tackle longtime thorny issues like illegal vending and food cart jams.

After the community outcry at the organizers’ initial plan, they rejiggered some aspects, including decreasing the district’s proposed budget to $550,000 and ensuring that owners of residential co-ops and condos would pay only nominal assessment fees.

Brian Steinwurtzel, who is on the district plan’s steering committee and whose family owns two buildings on the strip, said his group had been reaching out to residents along Broadway and had slowly but steadily won broad support.

“This is about sweeping the sidewalks, cleaning the intersections and crosswalks, especially when it’s snowing, and it’s about taking the garbage and providing more garbage cans,” Mr. Steinwurtzel said. “The people who are part of ‘SoHo No BID,’ I would love it if they would help participate in this,” he added, referring to a group of the plan’s critics.

Meanwhile, several residents on Broadway who initially opposed the plan said they found themselves supporting it.

“There’s a lot of misinformation about the BID,” said Cheryl Klauss, a photographer who has lived on Broadway for 30 years. “I think it’s going to take care of the ramifications of having so many tourists here.”

But many residents remain entrenched in their opposition. They worry that the district would give the upper hand to real estate titans with properties in the neighborhood and that it would eventually be expanded.

They also argue that the proposed budget, now set at roughly $550,000, remains excessive, and that SoHo might find itself festooned with holiday lights and signs that would drive in yet more tourists.

“BIDs & not-for-profits are carving up NYC and claiming those areas as their fiefdoms, bankrolled by taxpayer money,” Pete Davies, of the SoHo No BID committee, wrote in an e-mail.

Another critic, Jamie Johnson, said the plan was an overly expensive solution to a terrible trash problem. “It’s ‘Let’s put in a chandelier when we only need a light bulb,’ ” she said.

SoHo to NYU: Don’t Overwhelm Our Neighborhoods!

Community to University: Don’t Overwhelm Our Neighborhoods!
Written by AlanKrawitz on February 16, 2012.

In so many ways, New York University has been a good neighbor and an integral, if not vital, part of the Downtown community.

But, when it comes to the venerable school’s ambitious, super-sized building plans, dubbed NYU 2031, which would add four new buildings covering several million square feet within the Washington Square core, many longtime residents of the Village are beginning to see the school in a less-than-neighborly light.

“We love the school, hate the plan,” said Brad Hoylman, chairman of Community Board 2, who attended Saturday’s rally at Judson Church, where hundreds turned out to protest NYU’s massive building plans.

Holding signs with slogans that read, “Flowers, not towers,” and “Condemned by NYU: Gardens going, going, gone,” a crowd of nearly 500 that included village residents, community activists and politicians expressed their disapproval of the scale and scope of NYU’s 20-year building plan that would effectively remake the face of Greenwich Village and the surrounding area.

“NYU’s position is to change the area zoning from its current residential/institutional character to one that emulates the center of Manhattan,” said Janet Hayes, a Republican district leader who attended the rally and lives on LaGuardia Place, near a Morton Williams Supermarket that is the site of a proposed school. “The 20-year plan allows for a high-rise, 40-story, block-long building and large commercial tenancies.”

Hayes added that many villagers see the NYU plan as self-serving, as opposed to the neighborhoods’ aspirations to preserve the character of the area. She also pointed out that the school had received—and declined—numerous offers to expand in Lower Manhattan below Canal Street.

Assembly Member Deborah Glick said that the plan in its current form would “severely alter” the low-rise character and quality of the Village. “In addition,” Glick said, “the four new towers would cast shadows where there were previously none.”

Hoylman called the rally at Judson Church a “call to action” as the board nears its Thursday, Feb. 23 deadline to consider a resolution on this issue and then send it on to the Department of City Planning on March 11. “Our recommendation, while advisory,” said Hoylman, “packs a punch.”

The NYU 2031 Plan is only a month into the lengthy, 7-month Uniform Land Use Review Procedure that involves approvals and recommendations from the Community Board, the borough president, Department of City Planning, City Council and the mayor.

While many in the community are already calling for the NYU plan to be scaled back, Hoylman says that the plan is too concentrated in a very small, dense area and will ultimately bring thousands of new residents, students and faculty members to an already overpopulated and vulnerable neighborhood that includes seniors and rent-stabilized residents.

“At the moment, there is really no flexibility on NYU’s part,” he said.

In response to the rally, NYU spokesman John Beckman issued the following statement: “As NYU continues to move through the city’s mandated public review process, we look forward to continuing our discussions with all stakeholders involved.”

Older residents have talked to me that the NYU 2031 plan resonates with Occupy Wall Street. Here we do not have a large financial institution but a financially well-endowed institution where elite interests and political dealings have likely trumped the people’s voice,” Jeanne Wilcke, president of the Downtown Independent Democrats.

Sean Sweeney, a member of CB2 and the SoHo Alliance, sees the NYU plan as having even more far-reaching effects.

“Although many say that this NYU plan will affect the Village only, in fact it will severely impact Soho, Noho and Tribeca much more than most of the Village, since the plans for construction are focused on Houston Street and the two blocks north of that [Bleecker and West 3rd streets],” Sweeney said.

“As a result, we would expect to get the ill effects of construction in Soho as well as hordes of students from the dorms proposed just across the street from our community…Think more beer pong bars and fewer fine dining establishments.”

– Alan Krawitz